Response 2: Interactive CoMedia Shared Histories

Please Click to ENLARGE!

CoMedia Shared Histories - An Interactive Chat for SubTextual Comments & Mutual Viewing

In considering a context for a 2-D chat environment Kate & I realized that we would only really want to participate in a space if it was very context specific, a defined topic with layers of rich cultural interpretation and previous discussion. Kate mentioned that John Maeda once said to her that the problem with the web is that it is Lonely. We can't see that other people are there. I agree.

CoMedia Shared Histories, please click to see the full design, presents an interface for doing the following:

MACRO:
1) Choose a realm for context of interaction (SEE TOP BAR):
a) Share, Collaborate, View the same information (documents & Files & Desktop)
b) Add SubText to Services connected to Media (Flickr, NetFlix, GenArt) CoFlix, CoGen
c) Poll or Aggregate opinions on in a Geographical Space on Specific topics.

2) Filter the History of Information by:
a) Related community - friends who share similar or disimilar categorical interests, or the case of the CoFlix - genres, or values.
b) Filter by VALUE PROFILE, things that you prioritize in your search for new or existing material - authenticity, dialog, character dev, natural lighting....
c) Filter By Date, Rating. See Drag bars on the top and bottom of the picture.

Filtering provides a way of turning on and off different layers of information, and adding comments to those context specific layers. People interact in a Geographical Space that reflects their History, Preferences, and links them with similar people in a large community.

MICRO: Viewing Specific Content within a Distribution Matrix:

In this case I have choosen to illustrate CoFlix - a system for mutual viewing of a NetFlix movie at the same time. Within this application viewers can focus on the following:

A) Specific Points in the Timeline of the Film, and types of comment layers that might show up within that Chapter or Scene.
B) Interpretations and Directors Commentary - comments that have been signified as valuable and integral to the production.
C) Meta Relationships and Links to similar scenes - and peoples thoughts around those.

As people interact with the system it records their preferences and updates their Profile History. This provides a framework for determining where their comments might show up later for other people looking at a film a second time and leaving their own notes and comments.

The depth of such a system allows for Realtime Interaction and Chat - but also builds a History of interaction with the Medium that is context aware. This would solve the problem of aimless chat and focus the discussion on the medium at hand, utilizing the most immersive medium in popular culture, film.

Response 1: Social Metaphors

Knowledge is Discussion (forums) is Community is Information is Knowledge

Beyond Being There stipulates that we need to focus on the needs behind our forms of communication over trying to recreate face to face communication: “it is not so much distance that will be abolished, but rather our current concept of being there.” The Archival, anonymous, and semi-synchronous benefits of a system like a forum or an electronic billboard do go beyond being there, but must be rooted in a common goal that either requires tools to manage it’s complexity, or tools to manage the distance between us. Rather than phrase the question in terms of “being there” or going beyond reality - I would sidestep the question and phrase the problem in terms of “tools that seamlessly integrate and enhance our current forms of communication”. The effort to create forums that united distributed and specialized communities, and push to create mobile devices that can exchange logistic information and integrate our digital a physical lives are focused on this type of cooperative relationship.

Forums like the New User Interface Group (NUI), a social network for the development of multi-touch tables that I am a part of, use the metaphor of the “forum” an architectural space of Gecko-Roman origin, as a means of information exchange and discussion. They rely heavily on the advantage of searchable archives and shared problem solve for the DIY communities of hackers around the world. I might lack social compatibility or even language compatibility with many of the people in the forum, but we share pictures and links as a way of enabling community research. The interesting metaphor that seems most present in the forum is a pseudonym, this acts in part to allow “newbies” to post entries in the forum without being shy, and administrators to appear informal - we are all in this together with a common goal and initiative. Not only a first name basis, but nicknames and syntax reflect the democratization of information that has become the tacit goal of many online groups - to provide a “bottom up” distribution of information that allows anyone to engage. This requires the initiative and vision of a few committed organizers and low level voluntary commitment of a larger community.

The forum approach is limiting in the sense that “topics” of conversation often start “threads” that are linear and users will complain that a topic has already been discussed. Issues are not relevant once they have been solved. Another difficulty is that the forums don’t provide a means for determining if an issue is solved, or summarizing the outcome of the discussion. People have to dig through the entire archive of correspondence of all the members to understand context - even when a search engine brings up results of a particular thread the things that come up don’t necessarily correspond with the heading of the first post. Similar dynamics occur in a classroom when one or two people initiate the topic of conversation and don’t allow for a lot of deviation from the threads.

---

Icons as Visual Metaphors: a database of iconic images?

The concept of vision as “the primary medium of thought” - and that without the nervous systems activity the mind does not function well, is reinforced by the efforts we have to present information in a visually dense but informative manner - using less symbolic constructs than text. This led me in a new direction of thought regarding visual representation:

Has anyone ever created a visual database of icons in vector or scalable format? A collection of cultural images that by popular vote that are simple line drawings in and shape forms immediately recognizable as our modern system of hieroglyphics?

I'm looking for images with a uniform look and feel that could be substituted for words when people speak. What if I translated your words into images realtime? Would that process make you think of the content of your words in different terms? If such a database existed and could be accessed like a wiki - wikicon would be the title of the project.

If an icon is an essential visual metaphor - the treatment of images would rely primarily on peoples semantic and historical notion of concepts: see Building a Visual Database for Example-based Graphics Generation (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=857735)

If shapes are concepts that icons are refined from a collective consciousness (gestalt approach) . I want to utilize an icon browser in some way that harnesses the intelligence of our perceptive minds... we hardly ever see out of context - p44 (Visual Information) - so why not transform or interpret the context realtime?

What underlying metaphors would such a system reveal about the manner in which we speak and our visual representations of those concepts? If concepts are structured in metaphorical terms, ie Love is Acceptance or Love is a Journey - It would be interesting if someone typed Love and saw images of those Metaphorical associations: IE: A hug or a person traveling down a long road come up when someone types love. Surprising and thought provoking results? We sometimes understand concepts in new ways through images - in a more cohesive way than we do when replacing them with more words.